Strategic Insights

What employers get wrong about GLP-1 spend

Sword Health Innovation Team

Footnotes

  1. 1

    Marsh. 2026 National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans, preliminary results (2027 projections). 2026. The 8.2% figure is projected after the cost controls employers already plan to use.

  2. 2

    Rodriguez PJ, Zhang V, Gratzl S, et al. Discontinuation and reinitiation of dual-labeled GLP-1 receptor agonists among US adults with overweight or obesity. JAMA Network Open. 2025;8(1):e2457349. Analysis of more than 125,000 adults newly prescribed a GLP-1.

  3. 3

    Sword GLP-1 wraparound pilot data, UK pharmacy partner, members enrolled since March 2026, run June 2026 at pilot week 18, as cited in Sword’s What Employers Get Wrong About GLP-1 Spend, and What the Evidence Says Works. Reorder rate measured against a matched control group (enrolled cohort n=144). Reorder rate is a leading indicator of persistence, not a measure of cost, and results are early and directional.

  4. 4

    Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Davies M, et al. Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of semaglutide: the STEP 1 trial extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(8):1553-1564. See also West S, Scragg J, Aveyard P, et al. Weight regain after cessation of medication for weight management. BMJ. 2026;392:e085304.

  5. 5

    Karakasis P, Patoulias D, Fragakis N, Mantzoros CS. Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and co-agonists on body composition: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2025;164:156113.

  6. 6

    Remarks by Abinue Fortingo, Population Health and Well-Being Consultant, Brown & Brown, on a Sword and Brown & Brown webinar on evaluating metabolic health solutions, September 2026.

Portugal 2020Norte 2020European UnionPlano de Recuperação e ResiliênciaRepública PortuguesaNext Generation EU
What employers get wrong about GLP-1 spend | Sword